Home
 
 
   
Root canal rationale?

Question:

My tooth doesn't hurt but my dentist says that I need root canal treatment. Do I need it?


Answer:

Quite possibly yes. An x-ray might reveal a chronic periapical (around the apex of the root) lesion which may increase in size, or even lead to an acute abscess which can cause pain and swelling.

This will never go away by itself.

This is one of the reasons why dentists will want to x-ray your teeth before proceeding with dental care. If there's an abscess (periapical lesion) it needs to be resolved before you have that crown, bridge or filling.

Symptoms of a tooth requiring root canal therapy:

1. Periapical abscess.

2. Sensitive to percussion ("Doc, I can't put any pressure on this tooth!")

3. Dull ache which is relieved by applying cold. Patient comes to the office with McDonald's supersize drink with lots of ice.

4. Sensitive to heat. Coffee makes it worse, cold relieves it.

5. Swelling - sometimes quite extensive.

Many times, however, a tooth can be restored without root canal therapy. Of course, this decision should be left up to your dentist.

Conservative treatment:

Several years ago, a young lady agreed to a treatment plan to replace several missing teeth with a permanent, fixed bridge. This required preparation of several teeth for abutment crowns which would hold the pontics (missing teeth replacements). The bridge would be cemented onto those abutment teeth.

The patient had pain in one of the abutment teeth for over 2 years. There was a very large filling in it, which was leaking around the margins and was putting pressure on the nerve upon chewing. I suggested the following to the patient:

1. Prepare that abutment for a well-fitting temporary crown. 2. Cement that temporary crown and see if symptoms subside. 3. If successful, (no root canal) proceed with bridge. 4. If not successful, proceed with root canal therapy, before bridge.

This type of approach avoids the necessity for root canal therapy, unless definitely required.

I believe that a tooth with its own natural blood supply and nerve is more desirable than a tooth that has undergone root canal therapy (the nerve and blood supply having been removed).

My reasoning:

a. A root canal tooth may be more brittle and may tend to split more easily than a vital tooth (tooth with the nerve intact). This concept is still questionable and unproven, but there's anecdotal evidence. That is, it seems to be so in many cases.

b. Many endodontists and general dentists excessively widen out the coronal (crown) portion of the root canal chamber in order to gain proper access to the narrow canals. This may weaken what's left of the tooth and lead to root fracture.

c. With root canal therapy, there's always risk of a perforation, broken instrument, or canal which cannot be properly negotiated.

d. A root canal tooth will many times require a post for restoration.

e. A root canal tooth will many times require a crown for restoration.

f. A compromised root canal tooth, post, and crown may need to be splinted to adjacent teeth for support. This is one sure way of avoiding problems. One problem tooth leads to 2, 3, 4 and more crowns, all linked together.

To reiterate, if a tooth needs root canal therapy, it needs it. If there's a choice, a more conservative approach may be more desirable.

The other side:

I have a colleague/friend who practices in an ultra-modern 12 chair office. He considers himself a big producer (his words). He told me the bits and pieces of his treatment rationale on several different occasions:

1. To the Doctor's chagrin, his (salaried) associate refuses to follow through with many of the Doctor's treatment plans. The associate alters treatment rendered.

2. If a tooth needs a crown, the Doctor always does root canal therapy first. His thinking is that the tooth probably will need root canal therapy at some point in the future. He prefers to do the root canal therapy beforehand.

3. If a tooth needs 3 or more restorative surfaces, he will recommend a crown (and root canal therapy). His thinking is that those large, unsightly fillings lead to more breakage and will eventually need a crown, anyway.

As you can imagine, almost everyone leaves the office with one or more teeth with crown, root canal and post.

The my most egregious example was a patient who had exactly one tooth in his mouth (an upper wisdom tooth). He had a root canal, post, and a beautiful crown on a perfectly useless tooth! The patient called me for upper and lower dentures. Normally, if there's one upper tooth, its desirable to rip it out first, so that the upper denture will settle on the gums properly.

In this case, I didn't have the nerve to tell that to the patient, so I worked around this one lonesome tooth!








 
Privacy Policy